State-Led Resilience: Lessons from California
The dismantling of climate science programs at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the cancellation of disaster preparedness grants at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), including the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program, represent an alarming withdrawal of federal support for coastal resilience. As a result, states have been forced into leadership roles traditionally held by the federal government.
California, with significant institutional, financial, and technical resources, alongside a longstanding public commitment to environmental protection, has become a powerful testing ground for climate adaptation at scale. While not without its challenges, the state's ability to experiment, iterate, and invest in coastal resilience solutions has yielded hard-won lessons that can inform other states' approaches, particularly those facing similar climate vulnerabilities that must be more strategic with limited resources.
Gathering insights from interviews with local, regional, and state leaders, this memo identifies three key strategies in California's coastal resilience approach that offer valuable lessons for other states:
-
Build a governance backbone with regulatory and non-regulatory agencies
Secure sustainable funding through dedicated revenue streams
Reduce resource gaps through technical assistance and targeted support for under-resourced communities
-
Create a shared vision that links local policy to state priorities like environmental justice
Leverage regional networks for coordination, knowledge-sharing, and grant support
Balance state leadership with local flexibility to respond to emerging issues
-
Standardize state climate data on open-access platforms
Translate climate science into action through expert engagement and practical guidance
Boost practitioner uptake with outreach, training, and user-centered design
